No Significant Risk Level
California’s Proposition 65 is a blueprint for accelerating wokeism
This is a Carousel guest piece by Twitter anon sorcova de corb
ACHTUNG! This text can expose you to adversarial thinking, which is known to the State of California to cause literal genocide. For more information, go to thecarousel.substack.com.
Humble Beginnings
It’s 1986.
America is high on coke, crack, and Reaganism.
Fitness enthusiast Jane Fonda and second husband Thomas E. Hayden endeavor to hold the line against GOP encroachment. They’re helping Los Angeles mayor Tom Bradley in a narrow race for California governorship against an insurgent Armenian, Republican incumbent George Deukmejian, by entreating more lefties to the polls. Hayden, long-time professional agitator and peak physiognomy example, settles on environmental and health concerns as potentially winning causes.
They muster attorneys to draft a ballot proposition and, in a masterstroke of “it’s literally in the name” marketing, dub it the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act. Ms. Fonda hangs up her leggings to campai…
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Carousel to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
 | A guest post by
|